Thursday, August 19, 2010

TEC Vendor Note: Lectra, A Focused PLM Player

Thirty years ago, Michael Porter introduced three best generic strategies—cost leadership, differentiation, and market segmentation (or focus)—in his 1980 book Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors. Since then, these three strategies have helped explain numerous success stories in the business world. While looking at Lectra with Porter’s theory in mind, I had to accredit market segmentation as a winning strategy for the company’s success.

Headquartered in Paris, France, Lectra provides software, hardware, consulting, and related services to its global customers. Its software ranges from design to pattern-making, 3D prototyping, marker-making, and product development collaboration. Its hardware is high-performance automated knife and laser cutters for fabrics, leather, industrial fabrics and composites. Fashion is the major industry that Lectra targets, however the company also serves the automotive, furniture, aeronautical and marine, wind power, and personal protective equipment industries. With that being said, Lectra looks quite diverse in terms of the product lines and industries it serves. However, when examined for the purpose of using Lectra products and services, the company’s focus is clear—Lectra helps companies develop and, to a certain degree, manufacture specific types of products that use soft materials. The commonalities amongst these products allow Lectra to service multiple industries and business functions and remain focused.

A Brief History of Lectra
Founded in 1973, and offering its first computer-aided design (CAD) systems for apparel pattern-making and grading in 1976, Lectra has maintained its key target customers with reasonable expansions.

1) Vertical expansion: Starting from pattern-making and grading systems, Lectra has been able to support more business activities within the fashion industry throughout its 37 years of evolution, for example, computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), textile and fashion design, product development collaboration and management, 3D virtual prototyping, etc.

2) Horizontal expansion: Realizing that its expertise and products can benefit some adjacent business needs outside the fashion domain, Lectra expanded its services and technologies to address the needs of developing and manufacturing products that require significant use of soft materials, for example, upholsteries for the furniture industry and seats, interiors, and airbags for the automotive industry.

3) Geographical expansion: Lectra established most of its global reach during the 1990s. Nowadays, the company generates 89 percent of its revenues outside France—93 percent directly with customers through its network of 31 sales and services subsidiaries, five International Call Centers, and five International Advanced Technology Centers.

There were ups and downs in Lectra’s history, but the dedication of the company and the leadership demonstrated by the management team saved the company whenever there was an internal or external hardship. Although Lectra has had vertical, horizontal, and significant geographical expansions, the company’s move has always been built upon its core competency: the fashion industry. Today, after its expansion in other industries, about 60 percent of its revenues still come from the fashion sector.

Lectra Product Portfolio

As discussed previously, Lectra’s vertical product development allows the company to cover its customers’ product development and production cycle with necessary specializations for each industry. In short, Lectra’s offerings fall into the following categories:

1) Collection Development Collaboration and Life Cycle Management

Lectra Fashion PLM: A comprehensive, modular, and scalable product lifecycle management (PLM) solution designed specifically for fashion brands, retailers, and manufacturers to create, develop, produce, and manage fashion collections from the designer idea to the final end-product.

2) Product / Collection Design and Development Tools

Kaledo®: Lectra’s fashion CAD solution that allows the digital design of fashion concepts (story boards), styles, prints, knits, and woven fabrics.

Modaris®: The CAD pattern-making and grading solutions, covering the apparel product-engineering process, that not only accelerate the pattern-making process but also simulate the “look and fit” results using 3D virtual prototyping.

Diamino®: Automated or interactive creation of cut-ready markers that prompt material savings and productivity gains.

Romans Cad®©: Specialized CAD for footwear and leather goods, covering 3D design, 2D pattern-making, model specification, and technical data management.

DesignConcept: Specialized design solutions for automotive, aeronautical, and marine interiors, furniture, industrial fabrics, and composite and furniture materials.

3) Digital Manufacturing and Cutting Room Solutions

Optiplan®: The solution that simulates, optimizes, and automates the material cutting process—a critical step in apparel manufacturing.

Progress® Brio: Automated spreaders functioning for continuous production during the cutting process.

Vector®: Automated cutters catering for various production volumes and material types.

ProSpin®: Single-ply cutter specifically for prototyping and small runs.

Leather cutting (MFC and CLS): Designed for automated leather cutting for the furniture industry (MFC) and the automotive industry (CLS).

FocusAirbag®: Lectra’s laser cutter specialized for producing vehicle airbags.

Where Is Lectra Standing Now

With €153 million ($214 million [US]) in revenues in 2009, Lectra holds a large market share in the fashion CAD/CAM and PLM market. Hit by the economic downturn—like many other software vendors—Lectra had noticeable decrease in revenues in the past couple of years mainly due to the decrease of new systems sales. However, Lectra was able to bring some exhilarating news by posting €43 million Q1 2010 revenues, up 15 percent relative to Q1 2009. More importantly, revenues from new systems sales (€17.9 million) were up 31 percent.

The in-depth knowledge that Lectra has accumulated through its long-time practice serving the fashion industry is the most significant competitive advantage it holds. From the artistic optimizations of the fabric cutters and cutting processes to the know-how and libraries embedded in the fashion collaborative solutions, fashion-specific expertise is a critical differentiator between Lectra and many of its competitors with shorter presence in the fashion PLM market. As a software and equipment provider purely dealing with soft materials, Lectra may not be quite effective at managing both soft-line and hard-line products at the same time if a customer needs to do so. However, soft-line along should give Lectra enough opportunity to grow.

Organic integration between CAD/CAM and its collaborative platform is a winning factor for Lectra. This factor becomes an even greater advantage when domestic fashion brands in emerging markets start to boom. Due to fashion manufacturers in North America and Europe outsourcing their production to lower-labor-cost countries, manufacturing process management (MPM) hasn’t been a big concern within many global fashion players’ PLM adoption plans. However, to these domestic brands in emerging markets, they need not only to design and distribute products, but also to manage the manufacturing process directly. In emerging markets, Lectra has already secured its ground on CAD/CAM products and has started marketing its fashion PLM.

Looking into the Future

Based on recent interactions with Lectra, my understanding of Lectra’s future growth is that the company will keep focusing on serving its current target market with greater breadth and depth in its product and service offerings.

Rooted in point solutions such as pattern making and fabric cutting, Lectra’s moves to product data management (PDM) and then PLM indicate the vendor’s growing interest in helping customers manage their business processes. As Lectra’s capability keeps expanding to supply chain collaboration, business performance management (BPM), and enterprise integration, the vendor’s future offerings may trigger another time of discussion on whether enterprise resource planning (ERP) or PLM should be the backbone for a company’s entire information environment, a topic that has been on and off during the past decade.

On the depth side, I’ll expect Lectra to support product design, development, and manufacturing process in a more granular manner. Enhancements in collaborative concept development, line planning, order management (for prototypes and samples), and vendor management will probably be seen in the near future.

Closing comments…
I’d like to discuss Lectra’s future in the cloud and to the crowd. The globalized fashion business has such a sophisticated value network with so many stakeholders contributing to the creation and delivery of a single product. Facing the shortening product life cycle, fashion brands and retailers will find that moving to the cloud is a way to further facilitate collaboration to tackle the ever-changing consumer demands.

In order to tighten the connection between product developers and consumers, companies are experimenting crowd-sourcing and social product development through proprietary and/or social media channels. As a PLM vendor with in-depth capability in creating, presenting, and managing product definition information for fashion goods, Lectra has great potential to help conduct effective and content-rich collaboration between manufacturers/retailers and consumers.

Get into the cloud and connect to the crowd. This is how I see the future of Lectra.




SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/tec-vendor-note-lectra-a-focused-plm-player-21273/

Enterprise Resource Planning: Bridging the Gap between Product Vision and Execution

Infor Plans

Infor, a global provider of enterprise business solutions for selected discrete and process manufacturing and distribution industries, has been building its vertical focus through a long series of acquisitions—acquisitions, which on the surface, may have seemed superficial, and a grab at the customer bases of languishing companies. Yet, Infor has been merging the product functionality and brain power of its acquisitions to better offer customers niche functionality and stability. (See Stability and Functionality for Process and Discrete Manufacturers for more information on Infor's acquisition strategy).

Such acquisitions are unlikely to stop as Infor continues to look for solutions that would fill out its current product suites (e.g., a transportation management system [TMS], plant management/enterprise asset management [EAM], product configurator, etc.). The skill and technology set from acquisitions could be adapted by Infor to meet specific industry requirements and be marketed to the diverse installed base. They can also be adapted and sold outside the install base as standalone, best-of-breed solutions.

According to its upper management, Infor's acquisitions can be divided into two categories: value driven acquisitions and growth acquisitions, and all were conducted after thorough, metric-based evaluations. This strategy appears to be working, even when compared to the strategies of Infor's awesome competitors like SAP and Oracle. Infor cites its organic ("same store") growth to be seven percent over the past fiscal year, driven by over 460 brand new customers (not existing customers or divisions of existing companies that are already customers that buy additional modules or Infor solutions) in the last fiscal year. These have been, in great part, driven by the sales of some "super breed" products, especially SupplyWEB. The maintenance retention has been between 9598 percent, without any maintenance price increases (which is typical after acquisitions), and includes winning back some departed customers, but excludes any brand new business.

Why has Infor been successful at tacitly nurturing and growing acquired companies when many more noisy competitors have not? Its vertical focus makes solutions functionally richer than even those of its larger competitors; it is financially stable and has a global presence; and it does not rely on large deals to close the quarter (Infor's average deal is reportedly around $300,000 USD). However, there is another reason. It puts continuous investment in research and development (R&D). Eighteen percent of revenues goes into R&D, which is high, given the industry standard is 14 percent or so. Infor also willingly supports and modernizes products on multiple platforms. While the vendor has been converging vertical solutions on one source code written in either Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) or Microsoft .NET environment, customers will not have to go through a costly and painful de-implement to re-implement upgrade process.

For more information on competing J2EE and .NET development environment camps, see Understand J2EE and .NET Environments Before You Choose.

This is Part Two of a two-part note.

Part One provided as situational analysis.

Infor Corestone

So, how does Infor plan to quickly converge innovative vertical solutions while protecting manageable, upgrade paths without forcibly marching customers towards change? To meet its goal, Infor has created its own internal development and integration environment, codenamed Corestone. Cornerstone has all but entrenched the following processes: drive enhancements by vertical differentiation, embrace leading technology platforms (i.e., J2EE and .NET) that leverage open standards, and embark on product development will use service oriented architecture (SOA) principles. Third-party applications might be used for non-core applications or functionality.

The deliverables of Corestone will eventually include a universal client framework that will provide a common user interface (UI), navigation method, and messaging standards for all Infor products. The environment will also provide unified development standards for more efficient global development teams and for database independence of all future products; enterprise java beans (EJB) will not be used. Stored procedures written in structured query language (SQL), which are operations that are stored with the database server, will not be used either. Instead Infor will move business logic to an application layer of its products, opening up the use of Web services, and allowing clients of all types to consume business logic, as needed.

Corestone will also create a library of re-useable utility components, such as single sign-on, authentication, licensing, printing, workflow management, reporting, enterprise service bus (ESB), etc. Rapid application development will be enabled through the development environment and UI design tool. Also, the Infor Business Integration Server (IBIS) platform will cater for eased integration with other Infor and third-party applications and services. Looking at the Corestone assembly environment, the top layer will consist of a raft of supported clients, such as Microsoft, Linux, and Macintosh smart clients. Microsoft IE 6.0 (and later), Mozilla Firefox rich browsers, and any commercially available regular browser will also be supported. Telnet and HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) will represent mobile clients.

The applications layer below will feature legacy applications that will preserve their exiting codes on RPG (Report Program Generator), Cobol, Pascal, Progress, Java, Microsoft Visual Basic, and C# etc., albeit portions of the code will have to be rewritten in Java. This will allow interfacing with the UI layer, the service/utility layer (single sign-on, authentication, licensing, printing, workflow management, reporting, etc), and the foundation layer (data access and control structures). It will also permit upcoming CoreApps master data management (MDM) wrappers that will allow for a common, horizontal master and item data model between vertical applications, and which will be mostly contributed by the Infor Distribution division. For more information on the importance of MDM and product information management (PIM), see SAP Bolsters NetWeaver's MDM Capabilities and The Role of PIM and PLM in the Product Information Supply Chain: Where is Your Link?.

On the other hand, all brand new solutions, the so-called Corestone-enabled applications, are being written in J2EE or .NET. Therefore, although Corestone may have many similarities with the SAP NetWeaver or Oracle Fusion platforms. The major difference is that these appli-structure platforms that are being developed by SAP, Oracle, IBM, Fujitsu, and Microsoft are, after all, proprietary, either in terms of database, and operating system (OS), or application server or both. Thus, Infor's technology roadmap will allow applications to be built in primordial third generation language (3GL) languages and outdated environments like RPG or Computer Associates' OpenRoad to use new services and functionality written in J2EE or .NET. Also, the SOA-enablement of business logic should allow existing business logic to be reused across multiple applications.

The use of Open Applications Group Integration Specifications (OAGIS) and e-business extensible markup language (ebXML) standards allows Infor to integrate modules and functionality into existing applications, assembling the best solution for its customers. Then, the UI integration will bring a common look-and-feel to all diverse applications, while single sign-on and authorization model should support tighter integration to other applications and common navigation between applications.

Further, CoreApps will eventually simplify integration and support multi-company installation strategies via the CoreITEM (for the item master and product data management [PDM] data provision) and CoreCV (for the customer and vendor master data provision). Last but not least, like in case of Lawson Landmark, Infor's applications will go through regular code regeneration for reasons of continuous code improvement. Infor will focus on further breaking down existing applications into more granular services and to write new applications and modules using SOA, whereby existing services will be occasionally replaced by new ones.

An example of Infor's work underdevelopment is an iSeries-based automotive enterprise resource planning (ERP) application called XPPS (coming from former Brain). It is based on the RPG language and on IBM DB2 database, and has received a new Corestone Smart client interface and Corestone-enabled functional extensions, like manufacturing execution system (MES) functionality and cross-divisional Infor Global Financials (coming from Varial Software). Many other similar products based on iSeries and pre-.NET Microsoft technologies are to follow suit. The pace at which Corestone will be applied to Infor product lines will be determined by individual Infor business units, which have their own product development, product management, and development organization. It will also have the responsibility to drive industry-specific functionality into products.

The centralized Corestone team will work closely with business units to drive standardization and a common environment across the entire Infor organization. The Infor India offshore R&D organization will be integrated with business units development teams to accelerate product development in terms of product quality and performance testing, with improved development capacity, flexibility, and cost effectiveness in mind.



SOURCE:
http://www.technologyevaluation.com/research/articles/enterprise-resource-planning-bridging-the-gap-between-product-vision-and-execution-18217/